The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6146•United States of America v. Rohan St. Joseph Keating, a/k/a Charles Joe
08-6146Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6989
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROHAN ST. JOSEPH KEATING, a/k/a Charles Joe,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:93-cr-00066-HCM-2)
Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008
Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rohan St. Joseph Keating, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Scott W. Putney,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rohan St. Joseph Keating appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for
reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Keating, No.
2:93-cr-00066-HCM-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2008; entered May 7,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.