Terrance T. Haggins v. BURT, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution, in his individual capacity

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6464
TERRANCE T. HAGGINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BURT, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution, in his
individual capacity; BOYD, Lieber Correctional Institution, in
her individual capacity; DEBORAH ROWE, Lieber Correctional
Institution, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, in her individual
capacity; FRANKLIN E. JONES; FULLER, Officer, Lieber
Correctional Institution, in his individual capacity; CHARLES
RODGERS, Officer, Lieber Correctional Institution, in his
individual capacity; JENKINS, Lieber Correctional Institution
Grievance Coordinator, in her individual capacity; WILLIAMS,
Officer, Lieber Correctional Institution, in his individual
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (4:07-cv-00931-HMH)
Submitted: June 11, 2008 Decided: November 10, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Terrance T. Haggins, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene P. Corrigan, III,
Jacqueline Gottfried Grau, GRIMBALL & CABANISS, Charleston, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Terrance T. Haggins, a South Carolina prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Haggins v. Burt, No.
4:07-cv-00931-HMH (D.S.C. March 12, 2008). We also deny Haggins’
motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --