The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6052•Russell L. Prevatte v. W. ELAINE CHAPMAN, Deputy Warden
08-6052Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 25, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6052
RUSSELL L. PREVATTE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
W. ELAINE CHAPMAN, Deputy Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:07-hc-02040-H)
Submitted: May 5, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Russell L. Prevatte, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Russell L. Prevatte, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Prevatte v.
Chapman, No. 5:07-hc-02040-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2007; Nov. 19,
2007). We deny Prevatte’s motion to substitute party. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.