The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-6021•United States of America v. Clynton John Chase
08-6021Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 4, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8063
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CLYNTON JOHN CHASE,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:91-cr-00086-GCM-2)
Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claire J. Rauscher, Federal Public Defender, Tanzania Chevon
Cannon-Eckerle, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA,
INC., Steven George Slawinski, Assistant Federal Public
Defender, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Adam
Christopher Morris, C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Michael E. Savage, Assistant United States
Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clynton John Chase appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chase
No. 3:91-cr-00086-GCM-2 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.