The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-2328•Akwari Kalu v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
08-2328Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2328
AKWARI KALU,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: July 14, 2009 Decided: July 28, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington,
Virginia, for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant
Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Senior Litigation Counsel,
Michael C. Heyse, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Akwari Kalu, a native and citizen of Nigeria,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have
reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of
discretion in the denial of relief on Kalu’s motion. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2009). We accordingly deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Kalu
(B.I.A. Oct. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.