The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-2271•Zeenia S. Satti v. Bank of America, N.a.; Bank of America Corporation
08-2271Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 29, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2271
ZEENIA S. SATTI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:08-cv-01008-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 29, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.*
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zeenia Satti, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
* The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Zeenia Satti appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action with prejudice. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Satti v. Bank of
America, N.A., No. 1:08-cv-01008-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 7,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.