The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-2254•Mark A. Ward v. PETER E. MALONEY, Plan Administrator; JOHN T. MCDONALD
08-2254Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2254
MARK A. WARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PETER E. MALONEY, Plan Administrator; JOHN T. MCDONALD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L.
Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00054-WO-PTS)
Submitted: March 16, 2009 Decided: April 1, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark A. Ward, Appellant Pro Se. David Aaron Kushner, WILLCOX &
SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark A. Ward appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Ward’s civil claims with prejudice and issuing a
prefiling injunction against Ward. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Maloney, No.
1:08-cv-00054-WO-PTS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.