The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-2179•Eugenia B. White v. Fairfax County Government
08-2179Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 24, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2179
EUGENIA B. WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FAIRFAX COUNTY GOVERNMENT,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
FAIRFAX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY SERVICES,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:07-cv-00696-LO-TCB)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugenia B. White, Appellant Pro Se. James Edward Wilcox, Jr.,
Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eugenia B. White appeals the district court’s order
granting the Fairfax County Government’s motion for summary
judgment in her Title VII action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. White v. Fairfax County
Gov’t, No. 1:07-cv-00696-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 1, 2008 &
entered Oct. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.