The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-2041•8:07-cv-02271-AW) DAVID C. SHARP v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
08-2041Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 1, 2009
Filed: July 1, 2009
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2041
(8:07-cv-02271-AW)
DAVID C. SHARP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed June 29, 2009, as
follows:
On the cover sheet, district court information
section, the case number is corrected to read “8:07-cv-02271-
AW.”
For the Court – By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk
-- 1 of 3 --
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2041
DAVID C. SHARP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:07-cv-02271-AW)
Submitted: April 29, 2009 Decided: June 29, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James S. Maxwell, Joel R. Zuckerman, Ethan S. Burger, MAXWELL &
BARKE, LLC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Charles A.
Valente, Margaret A. Lavanish, KRASNOW SAUNDERS CORNBLATH, LLP,
Chicago, Illinois, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David C. Sharp appeals the district court’s order
granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Sharp v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No.
8:08-cv-02271-AW (D. Md. Aug. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.