The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1880•Carolyn L. Washington v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defense Logistics Agency
08-1880Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 7, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1880
CAROLYN L. WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defense Logistics
Agency,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:07-cv-00482-RLW)
Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 7, 2009
Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott G. Crowley, Sr., CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney,
Debra J. Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Daniel L.
Freye, OFFICE OF COUNSEL, DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER RICHMOND,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carolyn L. Washington appeals the district court’s
order dismissing this action filed pursuant to Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. United
States Dep’t of Defense, No. 3:07-cv-00482-RLW (E.D. Va.
July 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.