Samuel Adinew Moltotal v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

08-1869Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 18, 2009

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1869
SAMUEL ADINEW MOLTOTAL,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: June 3, 2009 Decided: June 18, 2009
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alan M. Parra, LAW OFFICE OF ALAN M. PARRA, Silver Spring,
Maryland, for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant
Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Gerald
M. Alexander, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Adinew Moltotal, a native and citizen of
Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. We
have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse
of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2009). We therefore
deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board. See In re: Moltotal (B.I.A. July 9, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.