James Jones; Sharon Jones v. City of Frederick, Maryland

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1855
JAMES JONES; SHARON JONES,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
CITY OF FREDERICK, MARYLAND; LOUMIS GENE ALSTON; DIANA MARIE
KIMMEL; DEBBIE SHANKIE; JAMES HIRAM KIPPE, JR.,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
FREDERICK COUNTY, MARYLAND; STATE OF MARYLAND; SCOTT L.
ROLLE; CHARLES J. SMITH; FREDERICK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:07-
cv-03010-AMD)
Submitted: November 5, 2008 Decided: November 24, 2008
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Joseph Christmas, Stephen M. Gensemer, Justin Gregory
Nunzio, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellants. David Bruce
Stratton, JORDAN COYNE & SAVITS, Washington, D.C.; Kirsten E.
Keating, BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP, Washington,

-- 1 of 3 --

D.C., for Appellees. Debbie Shankie, James Hiram Kippe, Jr.,
Appellees Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
James and Sharon Jones appeal a district court order
granting summary judgment to the City of Frederick and Loumis
Gene Alston and dismissing their civil rights complaint
concerning James Jones’ mistaken arrest for a crime and
dismissing their state law claims arising from the same
incident. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the
district court. See Jones v. City of Frederick, Md., No. 1:07-
cv-03010-AMD (D. Md. June 19, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --