The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1780•Quintin T. Vasciannie v. Tidewater Skanska, Incorporated
08-1780Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 20, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1780
QUINTIN T. VASCIANNIE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TIDEWATER SKANSKA, INCORPORATED; SKANSKA USA CIVIL
SOUTHEAST, INCORPORATED; SKANSKA USA CIVIL, INCORPORATED,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:07-cv-01027-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zachary A. Kitts, COOK & KITTS, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for
Appellant. A. W. VanderMeer, Jr., Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
COWARD, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Quintin T. Vasciannie appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006)
claim and his 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) claim. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Vasciannie v. Tidewater Skanska, Inc., No. 1:07-01027-
LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed June 6, 2008; entered June 9, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.