Kenneth D. Liggins v. William A. Hazel, Inc.; Darrell Wolfe; Tommy Shell; Laszlo Eszenyi

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1772
KENNETH D. LIGGINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM A. HAZEL, INC.; DARRELL WOLFE; TOMMY SHELL; LASZLO
ESZENYI,
Defendants – Appellees.
No. 08-1971
KENNETH D. LIGGINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM A. HAZEL, INC.; DARRELL WOLFE; TOMMY SHELL; LASZLO
ESZENYI,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:07-cv-01084-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: October 9, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Mark Dare, ISLER,
DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006) complaint and
ordering him to pay attorneys fees and costs in the amount of
$5,000. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Liggins’s motion to compel and we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Liggins v. William A. Hazel, Inc., No. 1:07-cv-01084-LMB-JFA
(E.D. Va. filed June 20, 2008 & entered June 23, 2008; filed
Aug. 8, 2008 & entered Aug. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --