The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1537•Stanley D. Legum v. Smith Barney, Incorporated
08-1537Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 31, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1537
STANLEY D. LEGUM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SMITH BARNEY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr.,
District Judge. (2:06-cv-00542-WDK-TEM)
Submitted: September 30, 2008 Decided: October 31, 2008
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley D. Legum, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Harrold Sorensen,
GREENBERG & TRAURIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stanley D. Legum appeals the district court’s order
confirming an arbitration award against Legum and dismissing
this action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Legum v. Smith Barney, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-00542-
WDK-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.