ESTHER LEE BROWN, The Estate of Esther Lee Brown; LENTON C. BROWN v. ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1519
ESTHER LEE BROWN, The Estate of Esther Lee Brown; LENTON C.
BROWN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General; KEVIN MORRIS; BOBBY
MORRIS; LILLE DUBBY MORRIS; TONY BANKS; ROY COOPER, The
State of North Carolina Attorney General; BERTIE COUNTY
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; GREG ATKINS; WALLACE PERRY,
Commissioner; JOHN DOE, I; JOHN DOE, II,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 08-1950
ESTHER LEE BROWN, The Estate of Esther Lee Brown; LENTON C.
BROWN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General; KEVIN MORRIS; BOBBY
MORRIS; LILLE DUBBY MORRIS; TONY BANKS; ROY COOPER, The
State of North Carolina Attorney General; BERTIE COUNTY
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; GREG ATKINS; WALLACE PERRY,
Commissioner; JOHN DOE, I; JOHN DOE, II,
Defendants - Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (2:07-cv-00007-F)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lenton Creolle Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ammons Gilchrist,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Lenton C. Brown appeals
from various orders and the final judgment denying relief in a
civil action he filed on behalf of himself and the estate of his
mother. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Brown v. Gonzales, No. 2:07-cv-00007-F
(E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2008; Apr. 10, 2008; July 21, 2008). Brown’s
motions to amend the complaint, to vacate miscellaneous district
court orders, and to reopen the case in the district court are
denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --