The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1394•In re: Donna J. Fernicola; Robert E. Fernicola
08-1394Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 28, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1394
In Re: DONNA J. FERNICOLA; ROBERT E. FERNICOLA,
Petitioners.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:08-cv-00516-TLW-TER)
Submitted: August 11, 2008 Decided: October 28, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donna J. Fernicola, Robert E. Fernicola, Petitioners Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donna J. Fernicola and Robert E. Fernicola petition for
a writ of mandamus directing the district court to enter default
judgment in their favor in the underlying action. Our review of
the district court docket sheet reveals that the district court has
remanded the underlying case to Utica City Court in Utica, New
York. See GPO Federal Credit Union v. Fernicola, No. 4:08-cv-
00516-TLW-TER (D.S.C. July 11, 2008). Accordingly, we deny this
mandamus petition as moot. We also deny as moot the Fernicolas’
motion for a stay. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.