The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1336•In re: Keeble Anthony Hawthorne
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1336
In Re: KEEBLE ANTHONY HAWTHORNE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:05-cr-00294-REP-1; 3:06-cv-00286-REP)
Submitted: October 22, 2008 Decided: December 8, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keeble Anthony Hawthorne, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Keeble Anthony Hawthorne petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. Our review of
the docket sheet reveals that the district court denied relief
on Hawthorne’s § 2255 motion on August 14, 2008. Accordingly,
because the district court has recently decided Hawthorne’s
case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.