William C. Bond v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, District of Maryland, Northern Division

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1320
WILLIAM C. BOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, District of Maryland, Northern
Division; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, for the District of
Maryland,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(1:07-cv-01188-WDQ)
Submitted: August 28, 2008 Decided: September 12, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William C. Bond, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

*Bond also appeals from the district court’s denial of his
motion for reconsideration, motion to recuse, and motion for leave
to file an amended complaint. Upon review of the record, we find
the district court did not err in denying Bond’s motions.
2
PER CURIAM:
William C. Bond appeals from the district court’s orders
dismissing his action seeking relief under the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 2007 & Supp. 2008). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.*
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Bond v. United States Attorney, No. 1:07-cv-01188-WDQ
(D. Md. May 17 & Nov. 20, 2007). Additionally, we deny all of
Bond’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --