The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1290•David Bethea v. Department of Labor
08-1290Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 6, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1290
DAVID BETHEA,
Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Administrative Review
Board. (07-057; 2006-STA-023)
Submitted: September 19, 2008 Decided: October 6, 2008
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Bethea, Petitioner Pro Se. John Robert Shortall, OFFICE OF
THE SOLICITOR GENERAL, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
David Bethea seeks review of the Administrative Review
Board’s decision and order dismissing his complaint of retaliatory
discharge filed pursuant to 49 U.S.C.A. § 31105 (West 2007 & Supp.
2008). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s
decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for
the reasons stated by the Board. Bethea v. Wallace Trucking Co.,
No. 07-057 (A.R.B. Dec. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.