The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1273•Raleigh Adolph Bellamy v. Ford Motor Company; Nationwide Insurance Company
08-1273Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 4, 2008
* The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 46(d).
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1273
RALEIGH ADOLPH BELLAMY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY; NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:07-cv-00287-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. *
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raleigh Adolph Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Addie K.S. Ries, SMITH,
ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North
Carolina; W. Lewis Smith, Jr., ROBINSON, ELLIOTT & SMITH,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Raleigh Bellamy appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Bellamy v. Ford Motor Company, No.
3:07-cv-00287-FDW-DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.