The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1249•Martin Agenda Morfaw v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
08-1249Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1249
MARTIN AGENDA MORFAW,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: February 9, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009
Before TRAXLER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danielle Beach-Oswald, Amy M. Grunder, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION
LAW ASSOCIATES, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory
G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright,
Assistant Director, Patrick J. Bumatay, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Martin Agenda Morfaw, a native and citizen of
Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his second motion to
reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and
find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, we deny
the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re: Morfaw (B.I.A. Jan. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.