The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1185•Martha Gray v. Richmond Public Schools
08-1185Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 30, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1185
MARTHA GRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:04-cv-00692-REP)
Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: June 30, 2008
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martha Gray, Appellant Pro Se. William DeLaney Bayliss, Edward
James Dillon, Jr., WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Martha Gray appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion for reconsideration of its grant of summary judgment in
favor of her employer in her employment discrimination action
brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gray v. Richmond
Pub. Sch., No. 3:04-cv-00692-REP (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2007). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.