The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1174•Stephanie Angelo v. Richard Thomas
08-1174Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 31, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1174
STEPHANIE ANGELO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD THOMAS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:07-cv-00261-CMH-BRP)
Submitted: October 2, 2008 Decided: October 31, 2008
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. DeVita, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Jennifer Lee
Parrish, PARRISH, HOUCK & SNEAD, PLC, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephanie Angelo appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on her
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and state law claims because it found
Defendant was entitled to qualified immunity. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. See Angelo v. Thomas, No. 1:07-cv-
00261-CMH-BRP (E.D. Va. filed December 18, 2007; entered Dec. 27,
2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.