The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-1036•Gustave D. Biaka v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
08-1036Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 13, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1036
GUSTAVE D. BIAKA,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: October 17, 2008 Decided: November 13, 2008
Before MICHAEL, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville,
Maryland, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney
General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Kristina R.
Sracic, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gustave D. Biaka, a native and citizen of the Ivory
Coast, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider,
which the Board construed as his third motion to reopen. We
have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the
Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition
for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re:
Biaka (B.I.A. Nov. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.