The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7758•Nadine Batchelor v. Northrop Grumman
07-7758Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 3, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1491
NADINE BATCHELOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:07-cv-01032-WMN)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 23, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nadine Batchelor, Appellant Pro Se. James Joseph Kelley, II,
Charys F. Scotton, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington, DC,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nadine Batchelor appeals the district court’s order
denying her motion for reconsideration of the court’s memorandum
and order dismissing her employment discrimination complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Batchelor v. Northrop, No. 1:07-cv-01032-WMN (D. Md.
Apr. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.