The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7747•United States of America v. Roy W. Gray
07-7747Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 4, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7667
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROY W. GRAY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon,
District Judge. (3:99-cr-00086-nkm-1)
Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy W. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roy W. Gray appeals the district court’s order denying
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Gray, No. 3:99-cr-00086-nkm-1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2008).
We deny Gray’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.