The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7661•United States of America v. Freddy S. Campbell
07-7661Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6803
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
FREDDY S. CAMPBELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (2:05-cr-00120-1)
Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 17, 2008
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Freddy S. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Freddy S. Campbell appeals the district court’s order
denying his motions to review the Government’s refusal to move for
a sentence reduction based on substantial assistance and for an
evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Campbell, No. 2:05-cr-00120-1
(S.D.W. Va. Apr. 10, 2008). We deny Campbell’s motion for a
transcript at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.