The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7611•United States of America v. Duke William Linzy
07-7611Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 24, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7611
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DUKE WILLIAM LINZY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief
District Judge. (2:06-cr-00160)
Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 24, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Duke William Linzy, Appellant Pro Se. Monica Kaminski Schwartz,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Duke William Linzy appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider his sentence, construed as filed
under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Linzy, No. 2:06-cr-00160
(S.D.W. Va. Oct. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.