The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7548•James Anthony May v. Investigator Vanlandingham; Deputy Kolibek
07-7548Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 7, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7132
JAMES ANTHONY MAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
INVESTIGATOR VANLANDINGHAM; DEPUTY KOLIBEK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:06-ct-03124-D)
Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 24, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Anthony May, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Douglass Cannon,
James R. Morgan, Jr., WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Anthony May appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. May v.
Vanlandingham, No. 5:06-ct-03124-D (E.D.N.C. June 3, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.