The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7538•Gary Wayne Danner v. PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, Detainee Center
07-7538Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 15, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6955
GARY WAYNE DANNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, Detainee Center,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cv-00013-REP)
Submitted: August 18, 2008 Decided: September 8, 2008
Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Wayne Danner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary Wayne Danner appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this civil rights action without prejudice pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) based on Danner’s failure to keep the court
apprised of any change of address. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Danner v. Piedmont Regional Jail,
No. 3:08-cv-00013-REP (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.