The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7521•United States of America v. Jesse Leon Spearman
07-7521Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 9, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7521
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JESSE LEON SPEARMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:05-cr-00057)
Submitted: March 17, 2008 Decided: July 9, 2008
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jesse Leon Spearman, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Everett James, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jesse Leon Spearman appeals the district court’s order
denying Spearman’s untitled motion seeking relief from his
sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court, without prejudice to Spearman’s ability to file a
motion in the district court to modify his sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). United States v. Spearman, No. 3:05-
cr-00057 (E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2007); see also Kimbrough v. United
States, 128 S. Ct. 558 (2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.