The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7512•United States of America v. Alphelious Antoine Rooks
07-7512Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 2, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7543
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALPHELIOUS ANTOINE ROOKS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:99-cr-00312-RLW-2)
Submitted: October 15, 2008 Decided: October 22, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alphelious Antoine Rooks, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alphelious Antoine Rooks appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp.
2008) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Rooks, No. 3:99-cr-
00312-RLW-2 (E.D. Va. July 17, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.