The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7305•Johnny Woodard, Jr.; Carolyn J. Woodard v. ROBERT R. BROWNING, Trustee -
07-7305Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1329
JOHNNY WOODARD, JR.; CAROLYN J. WOODARD,
Debtors - Appellants,
v.
ROBERT R. BROWNING,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:06-cv-00484-BO; BK-04-04082-8-JRL)
Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 4, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Woodard, Jr., Carolyn J. Woodard, Appellants Pro Se.
Stephen Levi Beaman, BEAMAN & KING, PA, Wilson, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Johnny Woodard, Jr., and Carolyn J. Woodard appeal the
district court’s order denying their motion for reconsideration of
a prior order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing
their Chapter 13 petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Woodard v. Browning, Nos. 5:06-cv-00484-BO;
BK-04-04082-8-JRL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.