The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7178•United States of America v. Mark Allen Jackson
07-7178Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6825
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARK ALLEN JACKSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (1:99-cr-00421-1)
Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 23, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Allen Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen P. Learned,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark Allen Jackson appeals from the district court’s
order granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction
of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Jackson, No. 1:99-cr-00421-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 18, 2008).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.