The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7150•United States of America v. Durrell Toppin
07-7150Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6833
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DURRELL TOPPIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:07-cr-00013-JCC-3)
Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Durrell Toppin, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Michael
Edward Rich, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Durrell Toppin appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Toppin, No. 1:07-cr-00013-JCC-3 (E.D. Va.
May 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.