The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7149•United States of America v. Juan Francisco Sorto
07-7149Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6831
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUAN FRANCISCO SORTO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:96-cr-00251-JCC-2)
Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juan Francisco Sorto, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Leo Fahey, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Juan Francisco Sorto appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2)(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sorto’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Sorto, No. 1:96-cr-00251-JCC-
2 (E.D. Va. May 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.