The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7082•United States of America v. Melvin Antonio Burl
07-7082Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6781
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MELVIN ANTONIO BURL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:99-cr-00176-RGD-1)
Submitted: July 22, 2008 Decided: July 28, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melvin Antonio Burl, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Melvin Antonio Burl appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A.
§ 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2008). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burl, No.
2:99-cr-00176-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 2, 2008, entered Apr. 3,
2008). We deny Burl’s motion for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.