The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7045•United States of America v. Inocente Antunez Jimenez
07-7045Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6819
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
INOCENTE ANTUNEZ JIMENEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (4:01-cr-00031-H-2)
Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 23, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Inocente Antunez Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Inocente Antunez Jimenez appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) and its order denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Jimenez, No. 4:01-cr-00031-H-
2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2008 & May 21, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.