The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7023•United States of America v. Dorothy Ann Oiler
07-7023Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6808
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DOROTHY ANN OILER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston,
District Judge. (5:06-cr-00098-2)
Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 23, 2008
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Thane Clifford, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant.
Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, John Lanier File, John
J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dorothy Ann Oiler appeals the district court’s order
denying her request for re-sentencing, but granting her motion for
reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Oiler, No. 5:06-cr-00098-2 (S.D.W. Va. May 7, 2008). We grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.