The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-7003•Steven Glen Byrd v. State of North Carolina; Union County Sheriff’s Office
07-7003Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 10, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7237
STEVEN GLEN BYRD,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; UNION COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:08-cv-00070-FDW-CH)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 29, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Glen Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Joy Strickland,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; William L.
Hill, James Demarest Secor, III, FRAZIER, FRANKLIN, HILL & FURY,
RLLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Glen Byrd appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Byrd v.
North Carolina, No. 3:08-cv-00070-FDW-CH (W.D.N.C. July 7,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.