The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6940•Preston Hancock v. WENDY BROWN, Case Manager Court Legal
07-6940Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 29, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6662
PRESTON HANCOCK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WENDY BROWN, Case Manager Court Legal,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:08-cv-00014-HEH)
Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 25, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Preston Hancock, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Preston Hancock appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his complaint for failing to return a
consent to the collection of fees form. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Hancock v. Brown, No.
3:08-cv-00014-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.