The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6894•076894.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6894
KELVIN BROWN, a/k/a Kelvin Demeatrius Brown,
a/k/a Kelvin D. Brown,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIE J. BAMBERG, Deputy Director, in their
individual and official capacities as
Orangeburg Calhoun Regional Detention Center
employees; HORACE JAMES, Chief, in their
individual and official capacities as
Orangeburg Calhoun Regional Detention Center
employees; JERMAINE DOWNING, in their
individual and official capacities as
Orangeburg Calhoun Regional Detention Center
employees,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(8:04-cv-22925-TLW)
Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 17, 2007
Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Kelvin Demeatrius Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Christy Scott Stephens,
BOGOSLOW, JONES, STEPHENS & DUFFIE, PA, Walterboro, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Kelvin Demeatrius Brown appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v.
Bamberg, No. 8:04-cv-22925-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 28 & May 22, 2007). We
deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.