The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6874•United States of America v. Malcolm Eugene Golson
07-6874Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 5, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7229
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MALCOLM EUGENE GOLSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:01-cr-00047-RGD-1)
Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 21, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Eugene Golson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro
Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Eugene Golson appeals a district court order
denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and
find no error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See United States v. Golson, No. 2:01-cr-
00047-RGD (E.D. Va. June 17, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.