The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6861•Jamie William Sites v. Bureau of Prisons
07-6861Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 10, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6861
JAMIE WILLIAM SITES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
BUREAU OF PRISONS; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTE, CUMBERLAND; LISA J. W.
HOLLINGSWORTH,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:06-cv-02145-RDB)
Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 10, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamie William Sites, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jamie William Sites, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition, and on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sites
v. Bureau of Prisons, No. 1:06-cv-02145-RDB (D. Md. Dec. 21, 2006;
May 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.