The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6857•Tito Lemont Knox v. RT. GRAHAM, Officer; DEPT. GARNER, JE 0136
07-6857Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 8, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6944
TITO LEMONT KNOX,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RT. GRAHAM, Officer; DEPT. GARNER, JE 0136,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (9:07-cv-00283-HMH)
Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 28, 2008
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tito Lemont Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Miller Snyder,
CLARKSON, WALSH, RHENEY & TERRELL, PA, Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tito Lemont Knox appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Knox v.
Graham, No. 9:07-cv-00283-HMH (D.S.C. May 27, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.