The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6847•Douglas A. Jarvis v. Patricia R. Stansberry
07-6847Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 2, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6847
DOUGLAS A. JARVIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:06-cv-00444-RAJ)
Submitted: July 16, 2007 Decided: August 2, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas Alan Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Douglas Alan Jarvis seeks to appeal from the district
court’s order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition as a
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and transferring it to the District
Court for the Southern District of Florida. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant Jarvis’ motion for leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Jarvis v. Adams, No. 2:06-cv-00444-RAJ (E.D. Va. filed
May 7, 2007; entered May 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.