The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6824•United States of America v. DANIEL DEMETRIOUS JAMES, JR., a/k/a Dee
07-6824Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 19, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6824
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DANIEL DEMETRIOUS JAMES, JR., a/k/a Dee,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (5:04-cr-00262-FL)
Submitted: September 13, 2007 Decided: September 19, 2007
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Demetrious James, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Demetrious James, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion for a hearing based on the
Government’s alleged breach of the plea agreement. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. James, No. 5:04-cr-00262-FL (E.D.N.C. May 7, 2007). We
deny as unnecessary James’ motion for a certificate of
appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.