The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6761•Jabbar Jomo Straws v. JASON CRAWFORD, Lexington County Sheriff’s Department
07-6761Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 11, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6761
JABBAR JOMO STRAWS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JASON CRAWFORD, Lexington County Sheriff’s
Department; JASON SHULER, Batesburg Leesville
Police Department,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LEXINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;
BATESBURG-LEESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(4:06-cv-03220-HFF)
Submitted: September 26, 2007 Decided: October 11, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jabbar Jomo Straws, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II,
Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellee Jason Crawford.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Jabbar Jomo Straws appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Straws v. Crawford,
No. 4:06-cv-03220-HFF (D.S.C. May 2, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.