The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
07-6721•William Eugene Webb v. JOE DRIVER, CEO, Trustee
07-6721Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6563
WILLIAM EUGENE WEBB,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOE DRIVER, CEO, Trustee; D. MORENO, ISM; HARLEY G. LAPPIN;
KIM WHITE, Regional Director; A. GONZALEZ; UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (2:06-cv-00122-REM-JSK)
Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 17, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Eugene Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Gordon McGonigal,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Eugene Webb appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Webb v. Driver, No.
2:06-cv-00122-REM-JSK (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 26, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.